Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BETTING LAWS.

Important Changes Likely Next Year. LEGAL BOOKMAKING ? (Special to the ** Star.’’) 1 WELLINGTON, This Day. ( .There is every possibility of the t Gaming Amendment Bill, which has been passed by the Legislative Council, becoming law when the House of Representatives reassembles in February. The measure proposes to establish the . double totalisator and to permit the publication of dividends. It is anticipated that when the Bill • comes before the House a section of i members, while supporting the Bill, will endeavour to have inserted an amendment providing for the licensing of bookmakers. There will be a surprising amount of support for this amendment. The conditions proposed are similar to those now operating in South Australia, where the safeguards ; imposed have met with the entire approval of the Commissioner of Police, J while from the financial aspect the ( Treasury returns have been far greater ( than was ever anticipated. The Bill, as it now stands, was intro- ■ duced in the Upper House by the Hon E. R. Davis, a well-known Auckland sportsman. Twelve months ago a simi lar measure, with an added provision for telegraphing bets, was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr , E. F. Healv (Government, Wairau) but an effort by the Prime Minister (Mr Forbes) to have urgency accorded to the measure, which meant its passage at one sitting, was rejected by a majority of two votes. The Bill was then withdrawn. On that occasion, while the proposal to permit telegraphic betting would > have met with strong opposition, the ! other clauses had a chance of being passed, for a count of heads revealed a majority in its favour. The effort of the Prime Minister to accelerate it was ; a mistake, for other members who had private Bills were decidedly annoyed at preference being given to the Gaming Bill, and consequently voted against it being accorded urgency.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19341130.2.160

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20476, 30 November 1934, Page 13

Word Count
309

BETTING LAWS. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20476, 30 November 1934, Page 13

BETTING LAWS. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20476, 30 November 1934, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert