A VINDICATION.
.»,ToHho Tßdit6r hi tue Etoninc* Stab.
In yesterday's issue of the Star Mr Sims, in a short letter, denies the accuracy of that portion of the report of the late Hospital Committee meeting which applies to t himself; Mr Sims denies that he said "Dr Payne was not qualified." I must affirm that, if Mr Sims did not use those exact "W.ords,: he said the same in effect. Further on in the " correction" he says—" I am also made to say, of Dr Fox, that his qualifications,extended no further than an oculist. That I also deny." I must' gay that in the latter respect I transgressed. ;Mr Sims did not/mention the word oculist. He said, "eye doctor." » l only write this that there may be no 'misapprehension, because the report of what Mr Sims laid was-—though con-dettsed-T-aubstantially,correct. ; , - *■-*•**A ' ''-' °:" - Ybiji Bepoetee.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18750605.2.20.2
Bibliographic details
Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2003, 5 June 1875, Page 3
Word Count
142A VINDICATION. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2003, 5 June 1875, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in