Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RUGBY RULES DEFINED

CLAIMING A “FAIR CATCH”

PLAYER MUST MAKE MARK.

BALL STRAIGHT THROUGH SCRUM. By Telegraph.-—Press Association. Wellington, Last Night. Two question affecting the rules' of Rugby were decided by the management committee of the New Zealand Rugby Union to-night. The first was a ruling as to what actually constitutes a “fair catch” under the present rule, whereby a player claiming a “fair catch” must immediately make a heel mark, and tlie second dealt with the action to be. taken when a ball is put in the scrum 'and goes riglit through.'. , ‘ . '■ The decisions filially arrived at 'were:

A fair catch can only be allowed when the player claiming it has both feet on the ground and claims'the catch by making a heel mark. A penalty should be awarded only when in the ‘referee’s opinion the player putting the ball in -the scrummage intentionally does so in such a manner that it cannot be hooked. In all other cases of the ball passing right through a fresh scrummage should be ordered. Mr. A. C. Kitto asked if a. player who jumped in the air, caught the ball, came down and made a heel mark could be awarded a “fair .catch.” Mr. S. S. Dean: It is not a mark. Mr. Kitto: What-if an All .Black who toured in 1924 says a mark can be awarded? Mr. Dean: Well, I would like to know where it was allowed. The J9&4- team, he added, found it practically impossible to get marks. The question had. been discussed at the Imperial Rugby conference, where a markf.shad been looked upon as purely a defensive measure,, and it had been maintained that it should be awarded only in a player’s, own territory Mr. Kitto maintained that if a player landed on the ground and made a heel mark his claim should be allowed. He asked Mr. A. E. Neilson (honorary secretary) what his experience had been during the Springboks’ visit in 1921. i Mr. Neilsen: My experience was that a mark was allowed only when the heel mark was made practically simultaneously with the catching of the ball, I If a player was knocked over before he made his heel mark, it was pointed out, his claim could not be allowed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19300501.2.72

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 1 May 1930, Page 11

Word Count
376

RUGBY RULES DEFINED Taranaki Daily News, 1 May 1930, Page 11

RUGBY RULES DEFINED Taranaki Daily News, 1 May 1930, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert