Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RURAL MAIL BOXES

Sir,—l see that about 200 Invercargill residents will now have to call, at the Chief Post Office for mail. Delivery to their houses has been stopped because they did not erect gate letterboxes or move existing boxes to the street line. This attitude should have been adopted long ago. It imposes no hardship to erect a box, and undoubtedly the box must be a very great convenience, saving time and facilitating delivery. Yet the Post Office has had to compel a section of residents to meet their obligations by stopping delivery to their houses. This brings to mind an incident concerning the rural mail carriers. Some years ago a circular letter from the Post and Telegraph Department was sent to mail contractors pointing out that the department’s regulations are strictly subject to traffic regulations and local by-laws and that in no case does the department require rural mail carriers to drive their vehicles over to the wrong side of the road in orddr to deliver in rural boxes. The circular said that any driver who drove his vehicle contrary to the traffic regulations did so at his own risk, but that if a list of boxholders whose boxes were on the wrong side of the road was furnished, they would be requested to remove their boxes to the correct side of the road. The circular added: “It must be understood, however, that this department cannot insist upon the removal of the boxes.” This seems rather inconsistent. The department says it cannot insist on the removal of the box even to comply with the traffic regulations. Why? N. R.

Gore, February 23, 1942. [This letter was referred to the Chief Postmaster (Mr J. Lindsay), who said that the statement about rural mail boxes was correct, as the Post Office had no jurisdiction over the position of such boxes and rural carriers had to serve them whatever their positions. Local bodies co-operated, however, and did not raise any objections to rural boxes being erected close to the line of travel, provided reasonable steps were taken to eliminate the risk of collision or other danger. New boxholders were advised to erect their boxes on the left-hand side of the route.]

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19420228.2.71.2

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 24681, 28 February 1942, Page 7

Word Count
370

RURAL MAIL BOXES Southland Times, Issue 24681, 28 February 1942, Page 7

RURAL MAIL BOXES Southland Times, Issue 24681, 28 February 1942, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert