Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAUSE IN INSURANCE POLICY

UNLICENSED DRIVER’S ACCIDENT. (United Press Association.) Wellington, September 10. The framing of a clause in an insurance policy issued jointly to a firm selling a motor car under a hire-purchase agreement and the buyer was the subject of a reserved judgment given in the Supreme Court by Mr Justice Ostler, who ruled that the fact that the buyer was not the holder of a licence when he was involved in a collision did not, on a reasonable construction of the words of the clause absolve the insurance company from liability. This question of law arose from a damages action with Consant Fred Linekar and the Hartford Insurance Co., Ltd., which was submitted to the Supreme Court.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19360911.2.27

Bibliographic details

Southland Times, Issue 22992, 11 September 1936, Page 6

Word Count
120

CLAUSE IN INSURANCE POLICY Southland Times, Issue 22992, 11 September 1936, Page 6

CLAUSE IN INSURANCE POLICY Southland Times, Issue 22992, 11 September 1936, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert