FLOURMILLING CASE.
(Per Tress Association. 1 DUNEDIN, this day. The tenth day of the flour-milling case promises to be the last. At the conclusion of Mr. Skerrctt's address, Mr. Solomon and Mr. Myers will address tho Court, Mr. Adams replying for tho Crown.
Mr. Skerrett, continuing his address, stated that no part of Distributors’ scheme was to remove the right to choose brands of flour, but there were periods when it was impossible to sup? ply the brands ordered, when these were rationed. Generally speaking, these difficulties were in 1923, and disappeared in 1924. Dunedin and Invercargill bakers obstinately refused to givo orders in time to allow allocations to bo made. By ordering after tho 25th of the month these bakers wore able to obtain two months’ credit. Difficulties arose mainly through accidental temporary defocts, after which the flours complained about all regained their high'position on the market.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19241107.2.26
Bibliographic details
Poverty Bay Herald, Volume L, Issue 16579, 7 November 1924, Page 5
Word Count
148FLOURMILLING CASE. Poverty Bay Herald, Volume L, Issue 16579, 7 November 1924, Page 5
Using This Item
The Gisborne Herald Company is the copyright owner for the Poverty Bay Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Gisborne Herald Company. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in