MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Otago Daily Times, Issue 16591, 14 January 1916, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Thcksday, Jantjaet 13. ' (Before Mr J. 11. Bartholomew, S.M.) Judgment was given for plaintiffs, by default, with costs, in the following cases:— Todd and Brown v. Owen Horan, £1 12s 6d, balance for clothing (costs 10b) ; A. Taylor and Sons v. Thomas Anderson, £3 lis Bd, for furniture (costs 10s); Johnston, Sons, and Co. v. Mancel John Cooper (Mataroa), '£1 2s 6d, for books (costs Ste); same v. Montague Harold Reeve (Bkebahuria), judgment for costs (13s); same v. George Jones (Gi«borne), £5 ss, for books (costs 24s 6d); AhJfeld Bros, ajid Co. v. George Matchett (Opotiki), 10s 6d, for goods (costs ss); .Simith and Smith v. John Crawford M'Bride (Queenstown), 7s 6d, for glass (costs ss); 11. D. Lamb v. M. Kennedy, wife of James Kennedy (Plataeroa), £17 ss, for drapery, eto. (costs £2 0s 6d); Murray, Roberts, ajid Co. v. John Batger (Invercargill), £10 Is 6d, on a dishonoured cheque (costs £1 10s 6d); Briscoe and 00. v. William G. Baird (St. Kilda), £19 17s 6d, for hardware (costs £1 Is 6d); F. Porter v. Hugh Kane (Burnside), £10 on an 1.0.U (costs 26s 6d). Robert G. Tyrell v. D. M Tar lane.—Claim 19s on a judgment summons.—Mr Moore, who appeared for plaintiff, stated that defendant (who was not in attendance) would bo able to pay if it were not for his being continually fined for not attending drill.— An order was made for the payment of the sum claimed, with costs (ss), in default two days' imprisonment.