LIBEL ACTION
WOOTTON v. SIBVIEE,
Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright. LONDON, Jnly 17.
Mr Hulton, a racehorse owner, giving, evidenco in the Wootton versus Sievier case, stated that he told Sievier that his criticisms of Wootton about Lomond's running were wrong. Witness at the outset permitted Wootton to try his horses against others, but, owing to a good deal of unpleasant talk, he withdrew that permission. The stable had backed Lomond for tho Newmarket and Derby. The horse appeared fit. He also backed three other non-winners in the Derby. In neither had he the slightest ground to suspect Wootton or his sons.
July 18.
(Received July 19, at 0.20 a.m.)
A trainer named Dawson suggested, in reply to the judge, that the lengthening of the 6tirrup leathers might aire foul riding.
Other evidence was given to the effect that horses sometimes took a dislike to their riders owing to the latter punishing them during training operations. Another point raised was whether the public was entitled to information from owners regarding which horses were being merely run for practice when only more or less fit.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19130719.2.67
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 15820, 19 July 1913, Page 9
Word Count
182LIBEL ACTION Otago Daily Times, Issue 15820, 19 July 1913, Page 9
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.