Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TRAVELLING TIME RATES.

PAYMENT OF BRICKLAYERS.

INTERPRETATION OF AWARD. Higher wages than those prescribed are not a substitute for tho payment of travelling time where the latter is incurred, according to a * judgment delivered by the Arbitration Court yesterday upon a case heard two days earlier. Robert McLaren, builder, of Point Chevalier, was prosecuted by the Inspector of Awards for an alleged breach of the northern district building trades award. It was alleged that defendant employed certain bricklayers on suburban work and failed to pay them the rates for travelling-time prescribed by the award. He paid a rate of wages in excess of the award rate; in some cases the rate paid was more than equivalent to the minimum fate, plus allowance for travelling-time and fares, which, in the circumstances, he claimed it was not obligatory upon him to pay. The Court, in its finding, states: —"Tho provision for payment of travelling-time and fare 3 is apart altogether from the provision for payment of wages. The award provides foi' a minimum rate of wages, which an employer is at liberty to exceed. If he agrees to pay a higher rate to his workers, he is, of course, bound to pay them for any overtime worked at a rate proportionate to the actual wages rate paid. This has long been settled law. "The payment for travelling-time and fares is in a similar position. It must necessarily be so, for if a worker, receiving a few pence an hour over the minimum rate, worked only for two or three hours on any day, he would not receive for that day tho equivalent of the minimum fate, plus his fares and travelling-time allowance. The inspector did not ask for any penalty, tho action having been brought for tho purpose of obtaining an interpretation of the award. A broach is recorded, but no penalty will be imposed."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19261008.2.125

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19453, 8 October 1926, Page 14

Word Count
313

TRAVELLING TIME RATES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19453, 8 October 1926, Page 14

TRAVELLING TIME RATES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19453, 8 October 1926, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert