A PARTNERSHIP DISPUTE.
» [BY TELEGRAPHPRESS ASSOCIATION.] Christchckch, Tuesday. The Supreme Court has been occupied for two days with the case Talbot v, McOlatchie, who were formerly partners as stevedores at Lyttelton. The plaintiff bought out defendant for £4SOO, giving £3800 cash and 12 months' bill for £1070 for the balance and interest. He now sought to have the dissolution of partnership annulled and the money returned, alleging that the defendant had fraudulently concealed the fact that the agent for Shaw, Savill, and Albion Co. had told him that tho company were about to withdraw their business, the proSts of which were about £800 per year, from the firm. The evidence was of a very conflicting nature, and at the conclusion of the case an arrangement was come to between the parties by which the dissolution stands good, but the defendant returns to the plaintiff the promissory note and pays £300 coats,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18870615.2.18
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIV, Issue 7975, 15 June 1887, Page 5
Word Count
151A PARTNERSHIP DISPUTE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXIV, Issue 7975, 15 June 1887, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in