Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT UNDERSTOOD.

To the Editor. Sir, — I have no desire to provoke a controversy about matters which, luckily, do not materially affect us here in this singularly favoured land of ours, and especially at a time when I know your columns are fully taxed. But "E.H." is in error in saying that I "condemn" the popular preacher of the City Temple. It is not my business to either condemn or "judge any man. He is a product of social conditions, and I have nothing to withdraw from my estimate contained in my last note. At the same time I am entitled to my opinions : I say, I can't understand him — and even "E.H." admits that he cannot explain one of his short and characteristic utterances within the limits of an ordinary letter. I What is the use of trying? I attended the City Temple on several occasions, and came away with a feeling of cloudy oppression — not because of the preacher's brilliant personality — but because I deemed his to be a withered message. Now just fancy telling a horde of hungry clerks — who, to use his own words, "were there in their scores — and probably in their hundreds" — that it was "God's will that they should drive pens — and add figures for 12 or 14 hours a day." And to back up this statement with philosophical arguments delivered in the crisp and clasical English of which he is snch a perfect master. Better laws, I should think, were required. Why shunt the responsibility on to the Almighty? I tried to sec something beneath the social surface whilst at Home, and I saw a ghastly sea of human misery on every hand, of which no colonial has even the faintest conception. "Raise the workers to Mr Campbell's altitude" ! Why. at their present rate of progress it will take fully 10,000 years to do that! All that Mr'Campbell said about the workers may have been perfectly correct. I think it was. But he was not the richt man to say it. Ancl. considering their environment, it surprised me that they were not a great deal worse. Yours, etc., R.S.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19070422.2.18.3

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XLII, Issue XLII, 22 April 1907, Page 2

Word Count
357

NOT UNDERSTOOD. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XLII, Issue XLII, 22 April 1907, Page 2

NOT UNDERSTOOD. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume XLII, Issue XLII, 22 April 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert