DIVORCE COURT.
Press Association. Electric Telegraph
Copyright.
Auckland, May 23. Tn the Divorce Court, in the case of Heinitz, telegraphist, of Wellington, formerly of Auckland, evidence was given that three private, detectives, including Fong, Chinese interpreter, watched the respondent's house, where the co-respondent Wilson and other men visited frequently. They crawled under the house and listened to a conversation in a bedroom which they overheard. A connter-charge o£ adultery against Detitioner was not proceeded with, "as both, counsel agreed that the aueation whether petitioner's conduct conduced to adultery was for the Judge to Hecide. The case is pro eeeding. Later. In the Heinitz divorce case tlie petition was dismissed with costs.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX19030525.2.43
Bibliographic details
Marlborough Express, Volume XXXVII, Issue 121, 25 May 1903, Page 4
Word Count
111DIVORCE COURT. Marlborough Express, Volume XXXVII, Issue 121, 25 May 1903, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in