Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BRUNNER DISASTER.

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES. , [Per Press Association.! , . HOKITIKA; March 30. The Coal Company’s case was continued at the Supreme Court to-day, but only two witnesses were examined Tennant, formerly employed as fireman in the mine, whose examination lasted over four hours, and Rooney, formerly a miner. At present there are three theories for the explosion as put forth by witnesses —a burst of, gas from a fall in the river, an explosion of coal dust from a blown-out shot, and an explosion of coal dust from a small gas. explosion. The claims received at present amount to £28,000.' There are no present indications of an early finish of the case.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT18970331.2.40

Bibliographic details

Lyttelton Times, Volume XCVII, Issue 11231, 31 March 1897, Page 6

Word Count
112

THE BRUNNER DISASTER. Lyttelton Times, Volume XCVII, Issue 11231, 31 March 1897, Page 6

THE BRUNNER DISASTER. Lyttelton Times, Volume XCVII, Issue 11231, 31 March 1897, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert