Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

To Be Maintained

EMPIRE SHIPPING Is a Subsidy the Best Method? DOMINIONS THINK SO (By Telegraph—Press Assn., Copyright.) (Received 24, 10.10 a.m.) LONDON, April 23. “Let me say as clearly as I can that the Government intends to maintain Empire shipping routes.” This categorical statement by Dr. Burgin, Mr. Walter Runciman’s lieutenant, in a speech at Hull constitutes the most favourable Government utterance thus far.

Mr. Burgin added; “We are gravely concerned as to the possibility of the United States subsidy seriously interfering with Empire routes, but the gravity of the situation does not necessarily mean that the best remedy is a short cut by adopting subsidies. There might be some other method. “Many urge the restriction of coastal shipping to the British flag or the subsidising of British coastal lines. That is also a big problem. British vessels carry a large part of the world’s coastal trade. The old doctrine of tit for tat might prevail if we commence reserving coastal shipping.”

The “Sun-Herald” news agency says: “Despite Dr. Burgin’s hesitancy concerning the best method of dealing with Pacific shipping Dominion representatives participating in the discussions are confident that there will be an eventual agreement in favour of a subsidy. They emphasise that this is tho only satisfactory way of meeting the problem. Moreover, Mr. Runciman is now much more favourable to a subsidy. He desires the most comprehensive details, including finances, before approaching a decision.” The “Daily Mail” says: “The Government has made promise after promise in the past two years to aid British lines in the Pacific, but nothing has been done. It is an immense disappointment that Ministers hesitate to act. Dr Burgin definitely discouraged the idea of counter-subsidising British lines. If there is any real alternative the country ought to be told what it is. We ought to act effectively now.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19360424.2.45

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXVI, Issue 112, 24 April 1936, Page 5

Word Count
306

To Be Maintained Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXVI, Issue 112, 24 April 1936, Page 5

To Be Maintained Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXVI, Issue 112, 24 April 1936, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert