VARIATION OF AWARD.
POWERS OF ARBITRATION COURT
A TEST CASE
(BY TELEGRAPH PREPS association
WELLINGTON, April 6. The Full Court was occupied -.0-day in hearing a motion to have an award of the Arbitration Court quashed. The appellant is Richard Edwin Holloway, of New Brighton, grocer, and respondents Justice Fraser, Hiram Hunter, and William Scott, comprising the Court of Arbitration.
The facts are that on November 26, 1923, the Court made an award, entitled the North Canterbury Grocers’ Assistants and Drivers Award, which came into force on December and continues in force except as varied by .''he Court after the award, came into force.
The case was stated at the request of an inspector and was submitted to the Court of Appeal for an opinion. On Novemiber 27, 1924, in consequence of an expressed opinion, the award was varied in numerous details.
The- appellant stated he had been advised bv coun-sej that the Court of Arbitration has no jurisdiction to make an amending order based on opinion of the Court of Appeal, and these proceedings are made with a view to having sfleh ah order quashed. Mr. Cuthbert appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Donnelly for the defendant.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19250406.2.63
Bibliographic details
Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 6 April 1925, Page 7
Word Count
198VARIATION OF AWARD. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 6 April 1925, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hawera Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in