Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXTORTION.

A WOMAN CON VTG'XEi). POINT FOR APPEAL COURT. By reason of a conviction at the Supreme Court at Aucniana on )\ etliiesday, a nice point avUI lie taiien to tne court or Appeal ror decision. The conviction concerned a charge °f extortion preferred against a married woman, cena ulazina, who was committed for trial from \Vaipu. sue was represented by Mr. Northcrott, and pleaded not guilty. The facts were admitted, argument having been heard in the upstairs courtroom Before the trial commenced. Mr. Justice Herdman presided. R. N. Nitz, a gumdigger, of MangaAvai, stated in evidence that he Avon a tea-set at a bazaar as a prize for guessing the length of a piece of string. Accused’s husband also guessed the same length, but xvitness - drew out of a bat xvitli him to see avlio should take the prize. Witness Avon. Later he received two letters in Avhich lie was threatened that if he did not return the tea set to the Mangaxvai hall committee by Saturday, May 3, he Avon Id be exposed for certain (alleged) immoral relations xvith a girl aged 15 years. Later, accused admitted to witness that she had written the letters for spite. A constable was called to state that accused had made a Avritten admission concerning the two letters received by Nitz, and also one letter to the superintendent of police. She said that she did not know she Avas doing wrong in demanding the surrender of the tea-set. Mr. Northcroft contended that there xvas no proof of a crime having been committed. The Judge instructed the jury to return a. verdict of guilty, since the matter xvas a. purely technical one. The only question in dispute xvas xvhether the accused had intended to extort a tea-set. She had not attempted to get it for herself, but for the committee. His Honor could only hold that it did amount to extortion. The question would be reserved for the Court of Appeal. Without retiring the jury returned ii verdict of guilty. Prisoner was sentenced to twelx-e months' probation. Mr. Justice Herdman said the sentence would be expunged if the Court of Appeal found that no crime had been committed. Had prisoner attempted to extort money for herself she lvould lniA'o been sent to gaol. Her action was stupid and senseless.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19241031.2.55

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 31 October 1924, Page 7

Word Count
385

EXTORTION. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 31 October 1924, Page 7

EXTORTION. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 31 October 1924, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert