THE STAVISKY SCANDAL
CASE AGAINST ONE COMPANY SENSATIONAL EVIDENCE Press Association—By Telegraph—Copyright* PARIS, January 31. (Received February 1, at 10.30 a.m.)' There was a sensation at the hearing of the case against one of Stavisky’s. companies. Plaintiff’s counsel revealed that the Public Prosecutor’s attention had been called in 1929 to the company’s operations, but no action followed the inquiry, and Stavisky’s con. nection was not even mentioned. The police in 1930 pointed out that Stavisky was the real promoter, and insisted that he should be prosecuted,, but nothing was done. Despite the prosecutor’s request for an adjournment for further information, tlie court decided to proceed with, the hearing.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19340201.2.97
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 21634, 1 February 1934, Page 11
Word Count
108THE STAVISKY SCANDAL Evening Star, Issue 21634, 1 February 1934, Page 11
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.