Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SHOCK TO FIRM

SUPPLY OF SPIRITS

LICENCE WITHHELD

(P.A.) AUCKLAND, June 9. Reference to the sale of spirits to sly-groggers by some wholesale firms was made by the chairman, Mr. J. H. Luxford, S.M., on behalf of the Auckland LicehsiiigHCommittee at the committee's, annual,meeting, today. A sensatioii. -wasi'caused when tne committee refused-toi grant renewal of a licence !b ihelrm- aPAS .AT Cdrbfati and Sons, 'Ltd:;'I"whts aijdrßpirit1 merchants,? Fort Street ■committee, adjourned the application, for six -months,- which mqans-that the firm' will be unable to operate" on Jts licence for that period. Before dealing with applications for the renewals of wholesale licences, Mr. Luxford said that the committee had evidence—it was not referring to all wholesalers in Auckland —in regard to the sale of spirits to sly-groggers which had been facilitated by the failure of some wholesalers to fulfil their duty in terms of the licence granted to them.

"We know that high prices have tempted some to sell liquor to slygroggers," added Mr. Luxford. "Wholesalers have the same obligations as retailers. It is unfortunate that the high prices that can be got have affected them and caused them to fail to carry out their duty. The committee feels very strongly about the matter."

When Mr. A. Corban, juri., appeared in support of his firm's application for renewal of its wholesale licence, Mr. Luxford referred to a police report which drew attention to a conviction recorded against the firm on March 12 last. The police report alleged that information had been received that the firm had been selling liquor in quantities not authorised by its licence. As a result of a visit by two women constables to the firm's premises in Fort Street they purchased a bottle of sherry. The actual sale of a bottle of whisky was transacted by a woman employed by the firm. She had the firm's authority to sell liquor, the report stated. Arising out of the transaction the firm was convicted and fined £50.

THE MEANING OF "ADJOURNED."

"Now in view of that report, do you say your firm is a fit and proper firm to hold a wholesale licence? 1' asked Mr. Luxford. Mr. Corban: The sale was made unwittingly, and the firm has been adequately punished, sir. I would point out that my firm has had a very long and clean record. It was pointed out by the Magistrate that a firm could only be fined, whereas an individual could be sent to pri-

son. "In any case, the girl would not fix the price for a bottle of whisky at £3 without instructions, would she?" asked Mr. Luxford. .

Mr. Corban replied that as. spirits were scarce the practice of the firm was to supply only for essential purposes. Mr. Luxford then announced that the committee had decided to adjourn the application for six months. Mr. Corban: Excuse me, sir, but what does that mean? i --. ~■ "It means that you will be without a wholesale licence for six months and that you cannot operate upon it during that time," replied Mr. Luxford. Mr. Corban then stated that owing to illness his firm's solicitor was unable to appear before the committee today. Mr. Corban said the solicitor would no doubt have conducted the matter much better and he asked whether the committee would amend its decision and adjourn the application till the solicitor could be present. Mr. Luxford: No. The committee will not do that. You are lucky, indeed, that the application is merely adjourned. Some of the members wanted the licence to be cancelled. I hope this will be a warning to other wholesalers.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19430610.2.87

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXV, Issue 136, 10 June 1943, Page 5

Word Count
600

SHOCK TO FIRM Evening Post, Volume CXXXV, Issue 136, 10 June 1943, Page 5

SHOCK TO FIRM Evening Post, Volume CXXXV, Issue 136, 10 June 1943, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert