Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CENSORSHIP OF FILMS

High School Board Views Dominion Special Service. Palmerston North, December 12. The question of a more strict censorship of films, which was considered at the last meeting of the Board of Governors of the Palmerston North High Schools; was considered again at yesterday’s meeting of .the board. The matter was raised at the last meeting, when it was reported to theboard that. 16 Auckland secondaryschools had met to consider the problem/of film censorship and had offered the following three recommendations to the Minister concerned:—

(1) That in order to make the censorship of films more satisfactory, the Board of Appeal should be reconstituted as an independent judicial body, to be presided over by an S.M., assisted by two associates, one of whom should be an educationist of experience, and the other: a nominee of the Chief Justice.

(2) That in as much as parents sometimes find it difficult to judge the nature of a film from the advertisements and posters; the censor be instructed to see that all posters are truly indicative of the character of the film to which they relate, and that the cinema proprietors be similarly; responsible to the censor in the matter of advertisements.

(3) That the censorship should be exercised in the direction of serving the best interest of the community rather than in pandering to the lower taste of a section of the community. Mr. J. W. Rutherford said that the first and third resolutions savoured of narrowness and “Mother Grundyism” carried to excess; • The’ movers had forgotten that the trade made films for a livelihood and so was entitled to representation on the Board of Appeal. The meeting decided to'support only the second resolution.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19331213.2.58

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 68, 13 December 1933, Page 9

Word Count
284

CENSORSHIP OF FILMS Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 68, 13 December 1933, Page 9

CENSORSHIP OF FILMS Dominion, Volume 27, Issue 68, 13 December 1933, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert