Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

[BY TEtECUirn—PRESS ASSOCIATION.) \ Invercargill, August 11, The Arbitration Court; sitting here to-day disposed of cases as follow: — A case against Masters and Son for having (it was alleged) taken orders for tailor-made suits when not occupiers of tailoring workshops was dismissed. Similar charges against two other clothiers were withdrawn. ■ J. T. Brooker (tailor) was fined £3 foi employing inoro girl apprentices than allowed by the award. J. W. Watson was charged with engaginj a male apprentice without notifying the in spector within a week of the engagement. There was a conflict of evidence, and' tin charge was dismissed. ' The Nightcaps Coal Company, was charged with employing five shift men at under the award rate of wages. . The case rests on the definition of shiftmen as to which the industrial agreement is not specific. The decision was reserved. E. H. Whitmorewas fined £5 for employing a compositor at less than the award rate of wages. The compositor ;was-fined £1 for accepting these wages. • Moor and Sons, sawmillers, were'charged with employing a stoker and engine-drivei at less than the award rate. The man named in the information as a stoker wai not engaged as such, and the case was dis missed. .In the, case of tho as the work w ono f: of' exceptionalcircum • stances, a breach was simply recorded, pro vided respondents pay-arrears.- - - ■ • J. Pai%ihite¥,' p T&ddlef, ? waV fined' £2 foi employing a journeyman at less than award rates,' arid the employee was fined 10s. •• H; Cox, sawmiller, >was' fined-£3 for' em-> ploying, a' man partly as bu'shman 'and partly as engine-driver at less than : the award rates. ' '' • In the • Sawmillers Union's application for an award, the Court suggested a conference, but the parties intimated that was hopeless.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080812.2.85

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 274, 12 August 1908, Page 10

Word Count
289

ARBITRATION COURT. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 274, 12 August 1908, Page 10

ARBITRATION COURT. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 274, 12 August 1908, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert