Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Justice system

Sir, —Your leading article under the above heading illustrates the muddled thinking of the draftees of the Treaty of Waitangi. The leading article quotes the third article of the treaty, which says Her Majesty the Queen of England, extends to the natives of New Zealand her royal protection and imparts to them all the rights and privileges of British subjects. In 1840 there was no such constitutional Queen of England. Further, had there been a Queen of England, what authority did she have to impart all the rights and privileges of British subjects? It is questionable whether the Treaty of Waitangi has any legal standing.— Yours, etc., '"A. MacKAY. July 22, 1989.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19890728.2.56.8

Bibliographic details

Press, 28 July 1989, Page 12

Word Count
114

Justice system Press, 28 July 1989, Page 12

Justice system Press, 28 July 1989, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert