TV advertising
Sir,—Your editorial on television advertising leaves a lot unsaid. This issue is far more complicated than your glib dismissal allows. Nowhere do you mention the constant breaking of concentration, which is necessary for commercials to succeed. You limit your comments to “irritation,” as if that was the only effect. Constant commercial breaks destroy wellmade programmes and limit the way in which television can be developed as a medium where creative writers can work in a different environment. It is farcical that the average New Zealander is prepared to pay $l2OO plus for a TV set, or $350 'a year to rent one, and then refuse adequate funding for programme production or purchase. A public education campaign is necessary to inform everyone of the dangers of an advertis-ing-funded service. I maintain advertising should have no place on a public broadcasting service.— Yours, etc., DENNIS WILKINSON. August 6, 1985.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19850809.2.116.11
Bibliographic details
Press, 9 August 1985, Page 16
Word Count
149TV advertising Press, 9 August 1985, Page 16
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.