Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

U.S.-Chinese cigarettes

Sir, — It is disappointing that China is joining America in promoting cigarette smoking. Economic “friendship” is no excuse for torturing asthmatics and other pulmonary sufferers. One aspect of “individual freedom” is the rudeness of smokers not only in polluting the air, but dropping their butts and other litter everywhere. By the law of averages, a lot of ash, spit and unburned but sucked tobacco threads must get into food. Fortunately, both their traditional politeness and their communist indoctrination would make the Chinese less objectionable than Western nicotine addicts. We are not told if America is to export tobacco to China. Cancer from cigarette smoking might be traced to the tobacco mosaic virus, which persists even in smoke carried a long distance. Asian tobaccos are relatively free from the virus, but cigarettes sold as “Balkan” and "Turkish” contain Virginian blends, which are all diseased — Yours, etc VARIAN J. WILSON. June 11, 1984. Sir, — I find it strange that Patrick Neary appears more concerned about cigarette smoking in China than he is about the pollutants in our own atmosphere. Chinese have been smoking for thousands of years. The United States participation will not increase smoking, but will probably result

in a better product for the many millions of Chinese smokers. I would prefer Mr Neary and the Clean Air Society to be more vociferous in campaigning against the real pollutants in our own environment. He could campaign against the inordinately high lead content of New Zealand petrol — the highest in any developed country in the world. He could also attack the highly deleterious smoke emission of incorrectly maintained diesel engines of buses and heavy vehicles, condoned here but not permitted in many countries. He might also consider the banning of high-sulphur coal for household fires, plus backyard rubbish fires. — Yours, etc., C. W. BROMLEY. June 11, 1984.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840613.2.100.15

Bibliographic details

Press, 13 June 1984, Page 18

Word Count
307

U.S.-Chinese cigarettes Press, 13 June 1984, Page 18

U.S.-Chinese cigarettes Press, 13 June 1984, Page 18

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert