Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Mr Minogue to wait and see

PA Wellington The rebel Government backbencher, Mr M. J. Minogue, is again holding out against proposed Government legislation — this time over the Motunui outfall controversy. The Prime Minister, Mr Muldoon, asked his caucus at a special meeting last evening whether they were prepared to support legislation to secure the water right for the Waitara effluent outfall and, it was hoped, solve the Motunui outfall wrangle.

Mr Muldoon told reporters after the meeting, “I. have four Labour Maori members and I now, as a result of caucus, have enough support to pass this bill.”

However, not all caucus members had given their support, he said. Mr Minogue told NZPA last evening that he would not approve or disapprove legislation until he had seen a draft bill and had the answers to certain “elementary” questions.

Last week Mr Muldoon received an assurance from the four Maori Labour members of Parliament that they would vote for the legislation if it enshrined the proposals over the Motunui synthetic petrol plant

made to the Government by Te Atiawa people. Te Atiawa want the proposed Motunui outfall scrapped and effluent from the plant sent to Waitara. Mr Muldoon said the only way the wishes of Te Atiawa could be met was to bring in legislation to secure the Waitara outfall, which expires in December.

Mr Muldoon said it was essential that a constant water right be guaranteed for the plant to avoid its being in default of its loan agreement. That loan agreement, of up to $l7 million, was the biggest of its kind in the world, and could not be risked, he said. “My principal concern ... is that we do not find ourselves in default of this loan agreement,” he said. That was the “essential reason” for undertaking the proposed legislation. Mr Minogue said he had suspended judgment until he had adequate information on which to make a decision.

He said he had “indicated to the Prime Minister and caucus that I am not prepared to make decisions on the basis of the kind of briefing we had in caucus.”

Mr Minogue emphasised that he had not given a final

yea or nay to the proposed legislation and said he thought “the Prime Minister may be assuming certain things he is not justified in assuming. I have not said no yet.”

The attitudes of the Waitara Borough Council, the local United Council and the Taranaki Catchment Board should be ascertained before a decision was made, he said.

There was indication last evening of dissension from other caucus members.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830427.2.10

Bibliographic details

Press, 27 April 1983, Page 1

Word Count
429

Mr Minogue to wait and see Press, 27 April 1983, Page 1

Mr Minogue to wait and see Press, 27 April 1983, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert