Bishopscourt

Press, 18 February 1983, Page 16

Bishopscourt

Sir,. — I join your correspondents in expressing deep concern at the proposed changes to Bishopscourt. That this fine building should be lost to our city, as indeed it will be if its perfect surroundings are disturbed, is to me an appalling thought. May I add my plea for the trustees to reconsider their' decision and to preserve the beauty of Bishopscourt. Such preservation of our comparatively few splendid old buildings is. surely a great service to the community. — Yours, etc.. J. A. GANT. February 16, 1983.

Sir. - Like N. Thompson (February 14). I visited Bishopscourt recently but do not agree that the proposed

scheme for its use entails the loss of this “priceless heritage forever." It is a matter of opinion whether Bishopscourt is a “priceless heritage" or even of particular historic interest. having been built in the twenties in an attractive mixture of styles. However, most will agree' that Bishopcourt is well worth preserving. There is no better way to ensure the survival of this elegant house than to keep it in use. Christchurch already has more than enough "priceless heritages" to maintain. The attraction of the Bishopscourt scheme is that the user will pay. — Yours, etc., H. A. CUTTEN. February 15. 1983. Sir, — In February, 1923. I arrived at Bishopscourt to become a student boarder there, while I attended the Teachers' Training College. I still have vivid memories of the beautiful grounds and the cherry tree planted by Archbishop Julius. Id it correct that the goldminers from the West Coast sent considerable contributions to the building fund for Christchurch Cathedral? I wonder what the pioneers would think of the proposed changes in Bishopscourt? I wish to stand up and be counted in my opposition to the proposed changes. — Yours, etc..

MURIEL ROSS (nee Bell). Hokitika. February 16. 1983.