‘Scoring at Court
Scoring, by Ken Hudson, directed by Elric Hooper for the , ; Court Studio Theatre. Jjme ; l to June; 19. Running tine: 8.15. p.m? to 10 pan. Reviewed by Gerrit Bahlman., : Morris in his btak;’“The Naked Ape,” describes the biological function of.sex, , in the first instance, 0-that of pair-bonding. The initial sexual interaction of a cbuple acts as a breaktnrough path which enables ttfe/;'slow of a qreper relationship in which sex takes a subordinate role. KehiHudson’s latest play is a sudy of this aspect of human and provides a conYxncing where the mature. stage of the relationship. is thwarted,. ’ -v p’The/■,■/-,. one-night .’ stand Scenario/ that Hudson, paints Vaises” interesting ./questions as . tb the impact’ of >a preemptive sexuab intimacy versus the-conservative shy approach to sex in the ore-
Pill era. Are the two persons unsuited or do. they miss 'each other because , of their, sexual liberality?' - , The play is rich in collo? quial imagery. The...young man presents a historical perspective on a relationship which disturbed him. His one-night stand seemed to demand more from him than simple sex. The play captures authentic fears and emotions. The . male’s sense of entrapment and the woman’s , need for - emotional fulfilment clash * poignantly. Geoff is portrayed by Peter Elliott with sensitivity and confidence. His delivery and timing were totally convincing — a fine performance,’which marks a . considerable /development of < his potential as a performer. Melissa Miles played Sue with initial nervousness but with evolving, warmth , and positiveness, jjer vocal; presentation seemed.a'-little too. well'" snoken ? at first ’ and
seemed to imply a calculating facet to Sue’s character. As the play progressed this impression slipped away and the warmth of the character emerged. . This production employed some useful devices to achieve the retrospective monologue effect required by the script. Captions were used in association with lighting,to mark the. transition points and bad the additional impact of presenting the monologues in an ironical light. The set; as might be expected, consisted of a double bed . and a dressing table in the bedroom- of f: a . shared flat. - s -. “Scoring” was specially commissioned by the Court Theatre arid -marks yet another valuable contribution to indigenous New Zealand theatre. Ken Hudson must .be congratulated on this humor- : oiis, sensitive'study of . the ; sexual' habits//6f. the hiked ■ Kiwi ‘ ' - . •
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820602.2.48
Bibliographic details
Press, 2 June 1982, Page 6
Word Count
377‘Scoring at Court Press, 2 June 1982, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.