‘Arrogant’ chop to hearings on planning bill
PA Wellington, The handling of the Town and Country Planning Bill; has drawn an outcry from' angry environmentalists. A decision by the Parliamentary select committee studying the bill to curtail( hearings on submissions has' been challenged. The chairman of the Envi-I ronment and Conservation' Organisations of New Zea-; land (Dr I. Prior) called the! committee’s action “an arro-, gant and retrograde way of dealing with the situation.” Environmentalists and other responsible groups and individuals were deeply con-! cerned that the committee had heard about 46 of the. 200 submissions. E.C.0., represents a big section of the country’s en-j vironmental movement, and' includes such affiliated nat-| ional organisations as the , Forest and Bird Protection: Society. the Federated: Mountain Clubs, the Deers- j talkers’ Association, the In-j Road Federation Mr J. S.- Callaway, of' Christchurch. has been; elected national president of| the Road Federation. Mr! Callaway is an executive! member of the Nos 13 and’, 14 district roads councils and; is serving a second term asj president of the Canterbury-! West Coast branch of the: Contractors’ Federation. |i
rstitute of Architects, and the 'National Council of Women. i Dr Prior said that groups 1; which wished to make submission to the committee 1 were given only short notice ito prepare their case. I “Now to go ahead and not J hear ail those who have I made submissions would I seem a negation of public ; participation in this important area,” he said. j Several groups and IndiI viduals had criticised “bad features” in the bill. i “It wouF" be much wiser to put off this bill’s passage 'until next year when the 'necessary modifications cani jbe carried out, rather than rush in through Parliament like this.” The Minister of Works |(Mr W. L. Young) had been! i“very eager” to have the ; legislation enacted this session. ‘ The legislation was com- | plicated and there had been ; difficulties in drafting it. If lit were rushed through as ■proposed, amendments . would have to be made later. i The bill is the first full reI view of the Town and CounI try Planning Act since it j was passed 24 years ago. The Government-appointed {New Zealand Planning Counicil attacked red tape and I inconsistencies in the bill in I a recent eight-page report lon the bill. ; The report cited potential i difficulties in which district land regional government! I representatives faced I i conflicts of interest.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19771112.2.42
Bibliographic details
Press, 12 November 1977, Page 6
Word Count
406‘Arrogant’ chop to hearings on planning bill Press, 12 November 1977, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.