Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

R.S.A. Opinion On Defence Policy

(From Our Own Reporter)

WELLINGTON, May 29.

The New Zealand Returned Services’ Association has mixed feelings about the Gov. ernment's proposed defence policy, as outlined in a report last evening. It is happy with the concept that regular land forces must be backed by citizen forces, and it is alarmed by suggestions that present Navy and Air Force strengths may be pruned to provide the money needed for the new scheme. "Defence is of such para-

mount importance that it must have priority for the provision of funds sufficient to provide and maintain adequate Navy, Army and Air Force establishments for the defence of New Zealand," said the president of the R.S A. (Mr K. W. Fraser) tonight.

‘‘One of the main roles of the Air Force is to provide maritime reconnaissance. Lauthala Bay is the only advance base we have for that purpose. Without it we lose a thousand miles of warning. “If we lose the Ohakeabased Canberras. what air defence have we in New Zealand? Unless we have a reasonably equipped and effective Air Force both strike and reconnaissance, what Incentive is there for youth to make the Air Force a career? It should be remembered that New Zealand sperut less a head on defence than the older members of the Commonwealth or the United States, he said.

Also on Saturday the presi. dent of the Air League referred to “the unfortunate example of large sums of money and man hours spent on what has proved to be an abortive substitute for a proper defence scheme." “Proper Scheme”

The R.S.A. believed that regular forces, adequately equipped to provide the hard core, and backed by welltrained territorial forces of sufficient numbers to provide a force immediately available to meet our treaty commitments, and provide for our own home defence, was a proper defence scheme for New Zealapd.

To New Zealand’s shame, and notwithstanding the most intensive recruiting campaign in the country’s history, the regular forces were not up to establishment. The voluntary system for the territorial forces had been tried twsce and twice failed.

Everyone must do \|hat was required. Till the country could supply and maintain regular forces of the required size, part-time citizen forces behind the regulars made the only answer.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19610530.2.146

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume C, Issue 29526, 30 May 1961, Page 14

Word Count
379

R.S.A. Opinion On Defence Policy Press, Volume C, Issue 29526, 30 May 1961, Page 14

R.S.A. Opinion On Defence Policy Press, Volume C, Issue 29526, 30 May 1961, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert