Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEGAL PROCEDURE.

I LAXITY DISCOUNTENANCED. (FBE33 ASBOCU.TIOH TELIOEAH.I WELLINGTON, May 28. The intimation that he would not countenance any laxity in the observance of the rules regarding discovery and other rules of procedure was given in the Supreme Court by the Chief Justice, tie had noticed, he said, that affidavits were brought time and again before the Court to the effect. "1 am informed, etp." There waß a rule that where a statement was made 'of that kind the source of information and the ground of the belief should be stated. That rule, to bis mind, must be insisted on.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19300529.2.45

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume LXVI, Issue 19940, 29 May 1930, Page 7

Word Count
100

LEGAL PROCEDURE. Press, Volume LXVI, Issue 19940, 29 May 1930, Page 7

LEGAL PROCEDURE. Press, Volume LXVI, Issue 19940, 29 May 1930, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert