Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT EVIDENCE.

BOY'S STATEMENT TO POLICE. QUESTION OF ADMISSIBILITY. When the jury returned a verdict of not guilty at the Supreme Court yesterday in the case of Heta Fred Gardner, who was charged with the murder of George Crewe, at ituatangata, a written judgment, prepared by Mr. Justice Smith at the conclusion of the first trial was released. His Honor said that in his opinion the statement could not be regarded as a voluntary confession. It was clearly established by the law that no statement by an accused person was admissible as evidence against him unless it was shown by the prosecution to have been a voluntary statement. "In my opinion," said his Honor, "that has not" been shown. The accused boy in May last was aged 15 years and seven months. He is a Maori, and is described by the medical experts ae feeble-minded. Hβ has the mentality of a child of nine or ten."

No threat in the ordinary sense of the word appeared to have been made during the examination of the accused by Inspector O'Hara and Detective-Sergeant Robinson, or by Constables Beasley and McKie, but his Honor's view was that the arrival of the four men in the boy's bedroom, the handcuffing of the boy and the taking of him to the police station, where he was surrounded by none but police officials, and the exertion there of pressure to tell the details of a story, amounted to the obtaining of a confession by a procedure which must be regarded, for the purposes of the matter, as a violent procedure.

His Honor said that for the reasons which he had mentioned the statement, which amounted to a confession, could not be admitted as evidence.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19321101.2.43

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume LXIII, Issue 259, 1 November 1932, Page 5

Word Count
288

NOT EVIDENCE. Auckland Star, Volume LXIII, Issue 259, 1 November 1932, Page 5

NOT EVIDENCE. Auckland Star, Volume LXIII, Issue 259, 1 November 1932, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert