Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

NEW BILLS. Among tne new bills read s first time I were the Workers" Dweiiinns Art Amend- ' ment (Hon. Mr Millar;. Offensive Pub- J lications Act Amendment (Hon. Mr I 3lr-Gowan i. and Back Shares Transfers Bills (Hon. Sir -Joseph Ward. AMATEUR LAWYERS. Mr Laurenson (Lyttelton | moved the second reading of his Law Practitioners . Act Amendment Bill, by which he sought to enable any person of good character !■ to prosecute or defend actions in New j Zealand Courts if authorised ir. writing by the party he renresented. There was no discussion upon the bill, which passed I its second reading by 52 votes to 20. ELECTTrE I_*_ECUTTTE. Sir William Steward fWaitaki! moved ' the second reading of his Elective Execu- j tive Bill. He prefaced tiie introduction of a time worn bill with the remark that I -Lome was not. built in a day. It had j been introduced ten times, and should. ! he urged, be'"brcurrhr. In by the Govern- | ment. During the discussion which followed the bDi was advocated by several Liberal members on the ground that if the Cabine-'- was elected hy the House the individual position of each -linister would be strengthened. A possible diffi : cuity was explained in the shape of members being elected who differed seri- j ously on great questions, and the im- ! portance of a. Cabinet Minister having colleagues with whom he could work was emphasised. Sir William Steward, in rsply. express- ' ed agreement with a member who asserted that if the principle of election had been in operation ar. the be.__iniag of the session it- would have resulted in appointing practically the same Cabinet, i as that, which now administered the colony. The bill wa,s thrown out by 32 votes to 20. GOLD DUTY ABOLITTO-N. The second reading of Mr Colvin's Gold Duty Abolition and Minn." - Property Rating Act could not be taken, as ! - it affected the revenue, and should have been brought down by Governor's mas- j sage. LAND VALUATION. Mr Earkbride's Government Yaiua- | tion of Land Act' Amendment Bill *was j considered in G-__n±Dtee and reported ' ' 'with slight amendment. ; NOXIOUS WEEDS. _The_ Noxious Weeds Act Amendment i : EHI. introduced by Mr R. McElenzie. k was further considered in Ccmmirtee. Mr Witty (Ei-carton; moved an amend- j', ment providing that the local authori-T , ' should clear roads of noxious weeds ii 11 a majority of the ratepayers petitioned ' i to this-effect, but this w-as rejected. Mr i', Tanner (Avon! wished to -empower local C autfa-riti-s to levy a. special rate for ''■ clearing, and the House occupied over ' : ■ an hour in discussing this. A motion to ■ ' report progress at II o'clock was- lost. ' ■ and the discussion continued apnarently ! ■ with the object or* talkxng- out "the bill, i ' Twenty minutes later progress was re- ' ported. The House then adjourned, ! '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS19060920.2.70

Bibliographic details

Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 225, 20 September 1906, Page 5

Word Count
467

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 225, 20 September 1906, Page 5

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Auckland Star, Volume XXXVII, Issue 225, 20 September 1906, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert