ACTION FOR TRESPASS.
Ihis morning, ab the Supreme Courb the S action Dinah Clark v. James Aikon, S £60 damages for trespass and for writ of Sanction, which ha 9 been before the Court S previous occasions, and adjourned to hear further evidence, again, c«tne befoie MrJußtice Conolly. Plaintiff .nc defend«nfc owned adjoining laud ab lonatona. The treapasa was the break-down of two fences bub defendant, while admitting the breaSne of bhe fences, alleged thab plainShadl wrongfully erected tho fences on a public road, ihicV by use'lad become a w"ht-of-way. This mornwg, Mr J. I. WUson ITeeidenb of Whang arei, who was duced it, showing tho wl;ole disbancs of tho furtberadjOurnedulJ^rUiw^t.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AS18930614.2.29
Bibliographic details
Auckland Star, Volume XXIV, Issue 139, 14 June 1893, Page 8
Word Count
111ACTION FOR TRESPASS. Auckland Star, Volume XXIV, Issue 139, 14 June 1893, Page 8
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries.
Log in