Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ITALY ACCUSED.

ALLEGATION BY ETHIOPIA^ CASE FOR INTERNATIONAL COURT. (United Press Association—Copyright.) LONDON, Sept. 17. Haile Selassie’s solicitors have telegraphed to the Permanent Court of International Justice that, they are authorised to apply for tho.. convening of an extraordinary session to hear the case of Ethiopia in the matter of a breach of international law by Italy.

The Permanent Court of International Justice, which sits at The Hague, has jurisdiction to deal with disputes in two different sets of circumstances—where two States by a special agreement submit a certain dispute to the court for judgment (voluntary jurisdiction) and where a State summons another State to appear before the court with or without its consent (compulsory jurisdiction). Action may be taken under the second head, either where it is especially provided iu a treaty or convention in force that any*or certain disputes arising from such treaty or convention shall be submitted to the court, or where the parties to a dispute have, by a general declaration independent of the paritculav dispute, accepted the jurisdiction of the court as compulsory. This general declaration accepting compulsory jurisdiction is made by the sign of what is known as the “Optional Clause,” and admits the jurisdiction of the court in legal disputes concerning the interpretation of a treaty, any question of international law, the existence of any fact, which, if established, would constitute a breach of an international obligation and the nature or extent of the reparation to be made for the breach of an international obligation.

Once the jurisdiction of the court is accepted by the parties, it is possible, should one of them refuse to appear, to pass judgment “by default,” that is, in its absence, although only under the strictest guarantees.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19360919.2.55

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume 56, Issue 290, 19 September 1936, Page 5

Word Count
289

ITALY ACCUSED. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 56, Issue 290, 19 September 1936, Page 5

ITALY ACCUSED. Ashburton Guardian, Volume 56, Issue 290, 19 September 1936, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert