Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPLE SHIPMENTS

APPEAL COURT CASE

(Per Press Association.)

WELLINGTON, April 27

The Appeal Court began the hearing to-day of the case W. H. Grove and Sons," Ltd., v. the Union Steam Ship Company. The case was removed by consent into the Court for determination aster evidence had.been taken in the Supreme Court. The question at issue arises out of the non-delivery of a cargo of apples from Vancouver for Auckland by the Makuva. The fruit was shipped on November 4, 1918. The boat arrived at Auckland on November 30, 1918. On account of the influenza epidemic on board the ship was quarantined. The Waterside Workers' Union declined to undertake to discharge the apples, and on December 7 the Chief Health Officer directed the defendants to proceed to sea. On arrival in Sydney the boat was quarantined and admitted to pratique on December 22, 1918. The engagement of the crew terminated at Sydney, and they were signed off owing to the shipping strike. A. new crew could not be obtained until January 16. The steamer returned to Auckland from Sydney on January 20, 1919, and i,he apples were landed' on January 2.1. The plaintiffs claim £1087 17s 6d damages due to the Joss of a favourable market. The defendants say that they landed the apples at the nearest port, as they were prevented from landing them before at Auckland; I that the contract and bill of lading were subject to the Water Carriage of Goods Act, 1910, exempting the defendants .from loss owing to strikes and for loss arising not by their actual fault or the neglect of them or their servants; that tho contract did not provide any date for delivery and the apples were delivered within reasonable time; that plaintiffs were to receive the apples immediately on arrival at port, and that the plaintiffs took no steps for receiving them; and ! that there were no facilities arid none were provided by' the plaintiffs to put the a'oples into' cold storage while the sTu'p was m Waitemata Harbour.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/AG19200429.2.33

Bibliographic details

Ashburton Guardian, Volume XL, Issue 9292, 29 April 1920, Page 6

Word Count
338

APPLE SHIPMENTS Ashburton Guardian, Volume XL, Issue 9292, 29 April 1920, Page 6

APPLE SHIPMENTS Ashburton Guardian, Volume XL, Issue 9292, 29 April 1920, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert