Page image

1.—13

20

Memoeandtjm for the Solicitoe-Geneeal re Piako Swamp Grant. Secretary for Crown Lands' Office, 19th July, 1876. Hon. Majoe Atkinson requests your opinion upon the following circumstance in connection with the Order in Council authorizing the sale of the land : —ln the printed copy of the order submitted to His Excellency a literal error occurred, the area of the block appearing as 83,000 acres odd, instead of 87,000 acres ; this His Excellency corrected before initialing the Schedule, but in the Gazette notice published the error was not corrected. Is a Gazette notice making the correction necessary ? C. E. Haughton.

Memoeanditm for the.Undee Seceetaet for Ceown Lands. The Order in Council should have been correctly published, and, if so desired, a notice correcting the error can be inserted in the Gazette. At the same time the original Order in Council is not invalidated by reason of the error contained in the published notice, and such a notice would be sufficient to make it clear. 19th July, 1876. W. S. Reid.

Memobandum for Mr. Haijghton re Piako Swamp Grant. Secretary for Crown Lands' Office, 20th July, 1876. I have examined the Piako Swamp grant, comparing plan with plan, and description with plan, and have made it correct. I have also compared the Schedule to the Order in Council with the grant, and find that they agree, with the exception of a few minor discrepancies in the former, and the alteration in boundaries caused by the taking out a block of 823 acres for the Natives. I would draw your attention to the circumstance that the terms of the original Order in Council make it imperative on the Secretary for Crown Lands to sell the land described in the Schedule thereto, the precise area of which is stated—viz., 87,325 acres; but the area of the grant about to be issued is less by 823 acres. Is it then necessary, in order to avoid any possible future claim, that the Order in Council should be re-issued, corrected to agree with grant ? Geo. Fannin,

Memoeandum for the Undeb Seceetaet for Public AVoeks. Secretary for Crown Lands' Office, 10th March, 1877. Aftee looking over the papers in this office connected with the Piako Swamp, I think I can now explain to you how the matter stands so far as relates to the requisition made by the Chairman of the AVaikato County Council for £1,000. This sum is wanted for the purpose of making approaches to the two ends of the road already made by the Piako Swamp Company. The sum of £1,100 appears to have been appropriated as a provincial liability on account of the unexpended balance remaining upon the whole amount to which the company was entitled upon account of its road-making operations, under its agreement with the Government. But it does not seem certain that this sum is available for the purpose, and it appears to be more than is due to the company under their agreement. They were to have the land at ss. an acre, out of which 2s. 6d. an acre was to be remitted to them for roadmaking, if done to that amount. Mr. Sinclair's statement shows that the amount which was to be allowed the company for roadmaking was £10,310 Bs. 5d., and after deducting from this the sum which they were estimated to have spent in road-making at the time of the Order in Council granting them the land—viz., £9,377 2s. 7d.— an unexpended balance remains of £933 ss. lOd. But there is a mistake in the Orderin Council which ought to be noticed. The purchase money being £22,529 Cs. 4d., out of which an allowance is made for road-making of £9,377 2s. 7d., the balance to be paid in cash was £13,152 3s. 9d., as stated in the Gazette. I find a telegram from the Hon. Dr. Pollen, of 13th June, 187G, authorizing the Eeceiver of Land Revenue, Auckland, to receive the smaller sum, and a reply from that officer that the money had been paid. If, therefore, the amount paid in cash on the purchase was less by £20 than it ought to have been, that amount should be added to the sum already allowed them for road-making, thus reducing the unexpended balance from £933 ss. lOd. to £913 ss. lOd. Information as to the amount actually paid could be obtained from the Treasury. If the sum paid was £13,152 3s. 9d., then the balance now available for road-making is £933 ss. lOd.; if £13,132 3s. 9d., the balance is £913 ss. lOd. I cannot say how far the fact of £1,100 being scheduled as a provincial liability would justify the view that that sum is actually available, but it seems to be in excess of what is authorized by the merits of the case. I assume you only want data to go upon, and that it belongs to your office to deal with the requisition for money for road-making. I hope what I have supplied will be sufficient for your purpose. J. Giles. The Piako Swamp Purchase. To amount of purchase money ... ... ... ... £22,529 6 4 By Cash paid to Public Account ... ... ... ... £13,152 3 9 By Allowance for Roads as per agreement ... £10,310 8 5 Less paid to AVaikato County Council... 933 5 10 Amount expended on road by purchasers 9,377 2 7 £22,529 6 4

By Authority : George Didsbuhy, Government Printer, Wellington. —1877. Price Is.]

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert