REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON CONFISCATED LANDS.

Appendix to the Journals of the House of Representatives, 1866 Session I, F-02

F.—No. 2.

REPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON CONFISCATED LANDS.

REPOBT BROUGHT UP 14th AUGUST, 1866, AND ORDERED TO BE PRINTED.

WELLINGTON. 1866.

INTERIM REPORT.

The Select Committee on Confiscated Lands to whom was referred the Bill entitled "An Act to validate certain contracts entered into with Aboriginal Natives entitled to compensation under " The New Zealand Settlements Act, 1863," and " The New Zealand Settlements Amendment and Continuance Act, 1865, " have agreed to the following resolution which they report to the House:—" That the Committee are of opinion that the engagements entered into by H. Hanson Turton, on behalf of the Government with the friendly Natives interested in Confiscated Lands within the Province of Auckland require validation. They appear to the Committee so far as there is evidence to be of an equitable character, and such as should be carried out. They recommend that a Schedule of all the grants issued or proposed should be appended to the Bill. Ceosbie Wabd, July, 1866. Chairman.

P.—No. 2,

The Committee to whom was referred the duty of inquiring into and reporting on the quantity and value of lands brought under the operation of the New Zealand Settlements Acts by the several Proclamations and Orders in Council issued under the said Acts, and upon the best mode of disposing of such as may be available for settlement, having carefully considered the subject referred to them, and taken evidence, have the honor to report as follows :— Your Committee have found great difficulty in obtaining evidence of a full and reliable character as to the extent and value of the different districts and blocks of confiscated land. In some cases even the area is a matter of estimate; and in all cases the number of acres available for sale or settlement, and the value per acre, have been arrived at only as an approximation. In the case of the confiscated lands lying within the Province of Taranaki, your Committee have been able to avail themselves of the evidence of Messrs. Parris and Carrington, who have supplied full and substantially accurate information respecting the land confiscated, and the various claims upon it. Owing to the comparative simplicity of these claims, the case of Taranaki has been the most easy of all to deal with ; and yet the results obtained by your Committee may be relied on as substantially correct, although they cannot be considered precise or final in the following respects : —First, the total extent of land confiscated is estimated from a sketch map of the coast. Second, the extent of land which may be adjudged by the Compensation Court during its approaching sittings to be due to absentee or other claimants cannot be foretold. Thirdly, the area which it may be thought fitting by the Government to grant to rebels who may return and surrender is uncertain. And lastly, the extent of the land in the interior which may be available for settlement within a moderate period has been arrived at, in practical ignorance of the facts, by an approximate calculation. A rule has been followed in making the calculation, which is found not incorrect in other cases. Half the area of that part of the land which is yet unexplored, but known to be a broken and hilly country, has been taken to be of some value, and the rest to be wholly unsaleable. In the case of the confiscated lands in the AV^aikato District in the Province of Auckland, your Committee have drawn the greater part of their information from the records of the Compensation Court, and from returns and written opinions furnished by Mr. C. Heaphy and Mr. J. Mackay. The computation of the extent and value of these lands has been exceedingly intricate and complex. The number of claims, both Native and European, on these lands, the variety of objects to which they must be appropriated, the diversity of dealings which have already taken place, and the uncertainty of future dealings, have rendered the task of your Committe extremely difficult. In this case, as in that of Taranaki, the extent of the land which may prove entirely unavailable for purposes of settlement can only be regarded as a probable conjecture; and, in addition, the area which it may be right to set apart from the most available lands for the residence of former owners who have been in rebellion, but may hereafter profess allegiance to the Queen, cannot be estimated by your Committee on any certain basis of authority. In the case of the Tauranga District, in the Province of Auckland, your Committee have taken the evidence of the Superintendent of the Province. Owing to the small extent of country taken by the Crown for European settlement, and the necessity which exists for devoting almost all the available portion to the use of the Militia, the extent which may be available for other purposes is merely nominal, and the final results cannot be very different from those set down by your Committee. In the case of the Bay of Plenty, or Opotiki District, the utmost uncertainty prevails. Tour Committee have been unable to obtain any definite evidence whatever as to areas ; and the deductions to be made by way of compensation to friendly Natives, and grants to returning rebels, are as yet wholly undetermined. In their attempt to form an approximate calculation, your Committee have assumed, from such opinions as have been laid before them, that there may be in the district 100,000 acres of useful land ; that as about one-half the original Native owners have been friendly or neutral, one-half of the whole land must be restored to them; that of the other half, or 50,000 acres, 25,000 acres will bo required for military settlement; and that the remaining 25,000 acres will be available for any other purpose. The block of confiscated lands within the Province of "Wellington will be, as your Committee are informed, handed back to the loyal Native owners. You Committee have prepared a tabulated statement, which they append to this Eeport, showing the gross area of each district, the deductions made or to be made under the various heads of appropriation, and the approximate extent of the remaining available land. To this they have attached such values as, on the evidence given, have seemed most nearly to approach a true estimate. Your Committee have carefully considered that part of the order of reference which directs them to report upon the best mode of disposing of such lands as may be available for settlement. They find that the lands in Waikato and Tauranga have already been disposed of to the Province of Auckland on certain terms, and are therefore withdrawn from their consideration. No such arrangement has yet been completed as regards the Bay of Plenty District, or the confiscated lands in the Province of Taranaki, nor has any proposal on the subject been submitted for the consideration of your Committee. They hold the belief that it was not in the intention of the House of Eepresentatives that your Committee should themselves initiate a plan for disposing of these lands, and they refrain from themselves assuming so large a responsibility. Ceosbie "Waed, 14th August, 1866. Chairman.

KEPORT OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON CONFISCATED LANDS.

F.—No. 2.

(«) Township of YVnitara, exclusire of sections granted to Natives. (/') EcseiTes included in this area have been banded back to the Native* ; acreage unknown, (r) No reliable information.

SCHEDULE showing the disposal of the CONFISCATED LANDS, and the estimated extent and value of the Lands still available for Sale.

4

REPORT OF SELECT COMMITTEE ON CONFISCATED LANDS.

Name of Block. Total Area Confiscated. Compensation and Reserves for Friendly Natives. Estimated extent for returning Rebels. Missionary and other Claims. Provincial purchased Lauds. Military Settlements. Immigrants' Allotments. Sold Lands. Mountain and Swamp. Saleable Lands. Rate per Acre. Istimated Value! Total Value. * | ! Pbovince of Tabanaki — £ s. d. £ s. d. £ s. d. Ngatiawa Coast 492,800 17,048 226,852 10,000 220,000 (a) 2,765 0 10 0 0 5 0 5,000 0 0 55,000 0 0 60,000 0 0 26,000 0 0 Waitara, South Oakura Ngatiruanui Coast ... 23,300 30,200 598,000 9,575 10,470 45,000 75,000 800 12,260 (4) 18,930 50,000 65,000 121,200 120,000 121,800 230,000 2,765 2 0 0 0 10 0 0 5 0 242,400 0 0 60,000 0 0 30,450 0 0 363,000 332,850 0 0 Total 418,850 0 0 I I Province of Wellington — 200,000 200,000 Nil. Nil. I Province or Auckland — 50,000 4,227 5,471 150,000 26,436 6,971 Waikato 1,217,437 224,080 303,274 278,422 168,556 0 5 0 0 10 0 69,605 0 0 84,278 0 0 Tauranga 214,000 2,000 164,000 25,000 11,000 446,978 153,883 0 0 10,000 2,000 0 5 0 10 0 2,500 0 0 2,000 0 0 Opotiki 480,000 100,000 25,000 ... [ W 25,000 12,000 10 0 \J \J 25,000 0 0 183,383 0 0 Total ... I Deduct Liabilities in Money, viz. — Compensation to Natives „ toSettlei-9 Expense of Surrey, &c, of Military Settlements 20,056 0 0 60,000 0 0 15,000 0 0 Net value —Province of Auckland £88,327 0 0