Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

The Mayor In Reply.

TO THE BDITOB.

Sir,— "Ex-Councillor" considers he has a grievance because I. took no notice of hia complaints as to the cost of taking the opinion of the ratepayer* on the question of electric tractidn. I never intended to do so; in fact, his estimates were bo grotesquely incorrect that they carried their condemnation on their face. All I was concerned with was to refute his untruthful statements about myself. I see ho is at the same game in his second letter. His assertion, .that my, first official act wa3 to raise salaried officers from ,£2OO to .£3OO and give others, .considerable increases js an absolute falsjehdpd. What happened was this. The Council unanimously resolved to grant increases to various officers amounting in all to .£165. The action of the Council in so doing I am quite prepared to defend. I have always" believed that men should get good pay for good work. As a matter of fact the ouestion of these increases was under consideration long before I took office. Let me again urge "Ex* Councillor" to sign his name to his letters. That would be fair to me, and would save other ex-coun-cillors, who value their reputation the h-onble of coming to me, as several havo done, to assure me that the letters were not written by them. And now one. or two words as to the Borough finances, I quite agree that our, overdraft at the end of the year will be bigger than it is now. I', was careful to point that out when first •I, .took office! I showed that > during the preceding, "i' 2 months the district fund' had gone to the bad over <£4,000 and that unless the position was faced thvige must get woTse. I urged the Council to make provision cither by an increased rate or a loan : "but I was not successful. Who is to blame for the result? Certainly not the men who pointed out the facts and asked t^at provision should be made accordingly. As to whether the ratepayers ought to be satisfied witli my administration, and as to whether I am responsible for the "bickerings" at the Council table, these matters I am quite wreparod to leave to the decision of my fellow citizens. I certainly decline to discuss them with a gentleman who refuses to come out ito the open, and who seems to have conscientious scruples against the truth. — I am, etc.,

C.-E-.-MACKAY

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WH19061022.2.55

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXX, Issue 12003, 22 October 1906, Page 6

Word Count
413

CORRESPONDENCE. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXX, Issue 12003, 22 October 1906, Page 6

CORRESPONDENCE. Wanganui Herald, Volume XXXX, Issue 12003, 22 October 1906, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert