DISTRICT COURT
MA^TpOT-FEIDAY. (Pejpje pis Honor District Judge ftpbipspn,} ' ' "'• JAMKS V. (JIIALJIERS. Ills Honor tliat on tbe application for arrest of judgment in this case, this would naturally follow upon tlio granting of a new trial jT' -*« doubtful whether this Court , <nw , "" n «.tliß decision had power to revm.- . « W,O V. U _ already given. The plaintiff, in jus opinion; had"undouhje,dly jj pjaim for action. The' essential maitej.' of knajida was negatived'by' tljo verdict. On the first claim he could pot attach much importance, The deplaiing pf 'tips' 'jury '.on certain issues was lie bplieyed' contradictory and against the weight of evidence. The jury failed to distinguish between a suspioion and a positive belief of fact, Be would not, however, impute misconduct to the. jury. On the whole matter he, felt bound to ordei" that there be anew trial at the next sittings of the Court. He would make no order as to costs. BANKRUPTCY COUM. A discharge was granted in the case of W, H. Robins, Edward Johns also 1 received his discharge, although opposed 'by Mr Sktrritt, of Geraldine, ' s!he public examination of Emma fngley.'wap" H)ts, 'adjourned till December 10tl),'as an affidavit jja'd been tiled that she was unable to appear,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WDT18901010.2.7
Bibliographic details
Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3635, 10 October 1890, Page 2
Word Count
202DISTRICT COURT Wairarapa Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3635, 10 October 1890, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in