Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BRIDGE OR TUNNEL?

END 0E DISPUTE IN NEW YORK \IEW OF GOVERNMENT WASHINGTON, July 18. A long argument whether New York should have a bridge or a tunnel linking the Battery and Brooklyn was ended to-day by the Secretary for War, fir. H. H. Woodring, who forbade a proposed £16,000,000 bridge on the ground that it would constitute a hazard and block access to the sea if destroyed in wartime. Mr. Woodring also commented that two existing bridges spanning the East River were potential hazards and should be replaced with tunnels when they wore out. One New York faction was bitterly opposed to the bridge on the ground that it would mar the famous Lower Manhattan skvline and injure the beauty of Parks. The other faction, including the Mayor of New York, Mr. F. La Guardia, contended that a tunnel was too costly.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19390720.2.74

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 83, Issue 169, 20 July 1939, Page 7

Word Count
143

BRIDGE OR TUNNEL? Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 83, Issue 169, 20 July 1939, Page 7

BRIDGE OR TUNNEL? Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 83, Issue 169, 20 July 1939, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert