AN APPEAL
RAETIHI LAW SUIT AN ALLEGED LOAN [ Per Press Association. ] WELLINGTON, Alarch 22. The Appeal Court (Sir Charles Skerrott an t d Judges Adams, Reeid andMacGregor), has before it J. F. O’Connor, of Racti.hi, versus W. E. Waldegrave, of Raetihi, solicitor. Appellant claimed from respondent and \\. 11, Tustin £olB 3s and interest, balance of a loan advanced to them in 1923 when in partnership as solicitors at Raetihi. The partnership was afterwards dissolved and an arrangement made by which appellant took a mortgage from Tustin for the balance due, and Waldegrave guaranteed that, he would pay £450. part of which had been paitJ. Juidgc Ostler held that by the agreement with Waldegrave appellant harl given up all his rights under the original loan an<l dismissed the case against Waldegrave. The appeal is against this decision. Air Spratt appeared for appellant and Alessrs Young and; Virtue for respondent. The appeal was dismissed.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19280323.2.35
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20103, 23 March 1928, Page 6
Word Count
152AN APPEAL Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 20103, 23 March 1928, Page 6
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Wanganui Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in