Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL CASE

INTERESTING TO PROPERTY HOLDERS. (Per Press Association.) WELLINGTON, July 8. The Court of Appeal was to-day considering the appeal of Boltdn v. Knight, the case emanates from Wellington, but is of general interest. The appeal is against the judgment of Mr Justice Salmond, who decided that an occupier of land is liable for a nuisance affecting his neighbour, notwithstanding that the cause of the nuisance was created by the predecessor in the title. In this case the nuisance complained of was the collapse of a retaining wall, against which accumulations of artificial earth had been banked for the purpose of levelling the ground of the upper occupier. The retaining wall having collapsed, the artificial earth came through, and did damage on the land of the lower occupier. The hearing was unfinished.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19240709.2.22

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXI, Issue 19057, 9 July 1924, Page 4

Word Count
133

APPEAL CASE Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXI, Issue 19057, 9 July 1924, Page 4

APPEAL CASE Wanganui Chronicle, Volume LXXXI, Issue 19057, 9 July 1924, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert