Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A DOG FIGHT.

"LET THEM HAVE A GO."

OWNERS BEFORE THE COURT.

A NOVEL PROSECUTION

(By our Travelling Reporter.) MABTON, Oct. 24. A novel case of, its kind in these parts was heard to-day at Feilding, and the result should show owners of dogs that it is against the law to allow them to fight. Two defendants were before- the Court, namely, Edward Jackman and William Christie; they were each charged with having allowed their respective dogs to fight. Both defendants put in a plea of not gupilty. According to tho evidence given, tho dogs were fighting, and Cockroft tried to stop them, whereupon he was told by Jackman not to interfere. Miller tried to separate the dogs, and got a hit from Jackman. Constable Kelly stated that he had seen the dogs fighting, and Jackman and Christie were not trying to separate them until he came" up. Christie said tho dogs wanted to fight, and he let them have a go. Jackman said Christie thought he had the best dog, and therefore they let them fight. Sergeant Bowde.n 'iSttftod .that ,Jackman had informed him the dogs started fighting about a sandwich insido the hotel, and,he took them outside. They .started fighting again. Christie had said his dog was better. Jackman. on oath, said the- dogs had been fighting in the passage, and he had carried his dog out by the back door. Later, they commenced fighting again. Men started to kick thorn, and he stopped that cruelty, and separated the clogs as fioon as he could. Ho (admitted that Christie had said he thought lie (Christie) had the better dog. Christie also gave evidence to the effect that he itned to |pinvent the dogs frpm lighting. The Magistrate said he could not help thinking neither of tho accused was very desirous of preventing the fight. A fine of 10s., with 15s. costs, was imposed in each case.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19121025.2.73

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Issue 12856, 25 October 1912, Page 7

Word Count
318

A DOG FIGHT. Wanganui Chronicle, Issue 12856, 25 October 1912, Page 7

A DOG FIGHT. Wanganui Chronicle, Issue 12856, 25 October 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert