THE CONINGHAM CASE
Press Association—Telegraph—-Copyrigh 1
SYDNEY, March 13.
In the Coning Ham ca se, in cross-exam-ination, respondent emphaticially denied writing letters to petitioner, making arrangements .and giving him the pointers in regard to ?the. trial "which 'Mr Want had put in as evidence.
Received, March 15th, 12.14 p.m. SYDNEY, March 14,
In the Coniiigham case to-day, Solicitor Mow!, ■who acted for the petitioner in the last case, produced a -rritten statement sent by the "petitioner for revision by his wife as to the evidence he was to get, and give at a former trial. The petitioner and respondent had both denied the existence of these papers. The petitioner explained, the denial, stating that Moss told him the papers had been torn up. This Moss denied..
The respondent when shown the papers said she v nad never seen them before or made 'alterations therein.
The cross-examination of respondent has been concluded.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19010315.2.34
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Chronicle, 15 March 1901, Page 3
Word Count
151THE CONINGHAM CASE Wanganui Chronicle, 15 March 1901, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in