Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF.

£SO DAMAGES AWARDED. The jury was absent for 31 hours, and on returning to court the foreman announced that they were not unanimous, but a three-fourths majority was in favour of a verdict for the plaintiff. The rep'ly to issue 1 was no; to issue 2, yes; and to 3, £SO. His Honour entered judgment for this amount, with costs according to scale.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIPO19211210.2.43

Bibliographic details

Waipa Post, Volume XX, Issue 1180, 10 December 1921, Page 8

Word Count
66

VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF. Waipa Post, Volume XX, Issue 1180, 10 December 1921, Page 8

VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF. Waipa Post, Volume XX, Issue 1180, 10 December 1921, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert