Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

. (Oiti correspondents opinions arc IheU own; the responsibility of editorial items makes sufficient ballast for the editor's shoulders.. It is necessary that all letters ]or publication should bear the name of the writer—not necessarily fOl publication, but as evidence of good faith.) TO THE EDITOR. SIR,— Through the columns of your unfettered and courageous little paper, to which I wish every success, will you enlighten those to whom false statements have been made as to the length of time which is necessary to elapse before licenses can be restored, if no-license is carried at this election. Thanking you in anticipation. —1 am, etc.', SEEKER FOR TRUTH. [lf the proposal for National Prohibition receive three-fifths of the votes recorded throughout the Dominion, all licenses (unless forfeited or determined in the due course of law) will lapse on the expiration of four years from the date of the poll (Dec. 7th). At the first general election of members of Parliament, which is held after the expiration of three years from the coming into force of national prohibition, a licensing poll shall be taken, fiat this poll the proposal for the restoration of licenses is carried, such determination shall come into force on the expiration of three months from the date of poll. We presume " Seeker for Truth" inquires for information respecting National Prohibition—ED. W.P.]

TO THE EDITOR.

SIR, —On perusing the columnsof a recent'issue of your paper,: I came across a list of officers elected to control theJßudgb Cycling Club, and to my ' great surprise I noticed that only one hanclicapper has been In common with other cluM: should there not be two or evegfc three ? This I am sure woup. give more satisfaction to. : tne majority of competitors. —I am, etc., i ■ V', Enthusiast,'!;,. [The subject of this letter has long! been a vexed question in every class of sport. A sole hanclicapper is favoured in many quarters, yet there are those clubs who prefer to entrust the manifold duties of this office to a -body of men. ' This letter would have been better if sent direct to the management. The list of officers published in our issue of October loth, was in

accordance with the appointments made.—ED. W.P.

TO THE EDITOR

Slß,—After living some months in your township, I find that the price charged for milk via. 4(1, per quart is higher than the Auckland prices, and the quality may be termed sky blue. An ordinary cow at this price will produce £SO per annum, What can our farmers say to these profits ?—Yours, etc., Skim Milk.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIPO19111117.2.20

Bibliographic details

Waipa Post, Volume II, Issue 62, 17 November 1911, Page 3

Word Count
428

CORRESPONDENCE. Waipa Post, Volume II, Issue 62, 17 November 1911, Page 3

CORRESPONDENCE. Waipa Post, Volume II, Issue 62, 17 November 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert