POSTAL INQUIRY.
COUNSEL’S ADDRESSES
(Per Press Association)
AUCKLAND, This Counsel’s addresses were tak the postal inquiry this mouiinl" Mr Gray contended that' Elliott’s charges had not been stantiated. Out of 2500 cnv e l! posted containing circulars only* persons received them empty two persons had been shown J have received them at all. y, posted to forty clergymen had l shown to have been delayed incensor, and the Post Office couil be held in any way responsible Irew a comparison between dgures he quoted and the charas :orruption made by Mr Elliott fc lie public platform. In one in s t, it least a letter was proved to i been wrongly addressed. In a nt» if instances envelopes were to •vith the flaps outside. Mr Ostler, replying, submitted the function of the Solicitor-Gen was wholly advisory. He had t# , "fr take independent action in nending a censorship. Such y le held to be entirely unconstitnti without instructions from the able Minister. Mr Ostler prot*| o review the evidence.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIPM19170823.2.12
Bibliographic details
Waipawa Mail, Volume XXXVII, Issue 7922, 23 August 1917, Page 2
Word Count
168POSTAL INQUIRY. Waipawa Mail, Volume XXXVII, Issue 7922, 23 August 1917, Page 2
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in