Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

No Explanation Received by Company.

(Received December 5. 2.30 p.m.) LONDON. December 4. The Gaumont British Company has not received official advice of the banning of the film “ Evensong ” in Australia, but assumes that the rejection is due to the same principles on which Beverly Nichols’s book was criticised. Mr Nichols himself is abroad. The Gaumont British Companystates that the film is quite unlike Mr Nichols’s novel. It shows an opera star in the flush of her glory. It is not a bitter pen picture of a faded opera star, such as was portrayed in the book. The newspapers attribute the banning of “ Evensong ” to the allegation that the book is a cruel picture of Dame Nellie Melba.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19341205.2.99

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20480, 5 December 1934, Page 7

Word Count
118

No Explanation Received by Company. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20480, 5 December 1934, Page 7

No Explanation Received by Company. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20480, 5 December 1934, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert