Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPEAL ALLOWED.

Question of Contemptuous Damages. Per Press Associ—l 'on. WELLINGTON. April 12. The Court of Appeal this morning delivered a reserved judgment allowing the appeal of Reginald Charles Boddie against James Dickson Sievwright, of Wellington, retired journalist. His Honor Mr Justice Herd man expressed the opinion that this was a case in which more than contemptuous damages should have been awarded in the Court below. He agreed that damages and costs should be fixed as mentioned by Mr Justice Kennedy who. in a long written judgment, fixed the damages at £l6O. with costs, in the Supreme Court, according to scale on that amount with disbursements, less costs, to respondent, who succeeded in the lower Court on the first cause of action and several parts of other causes of action, and who should have costs of trial in the Supreme Court, as on a claim for £750. Appellant was also allowed £25 solicitor’s expenses in connection with his appeal. The appeal was heard from March 12 to March 14. and in opening the case for respondent Mr H. F. O'Leary submitted that the only question which concerned the Court of Aopeal was as to whether the damages allowed by the trial judge, amounting in all to threefarthings. were reasonable, considering the evidence given ns to appellant's character and as to the pecuniary loss sustained by him as a result of the slanders. The damages, he contended, had been assessed upon a correct principle of the law. Mr C. H. Weston, K.C.. appeared for appellant. Judgment Upheld. Per Press Association. WELLINGTON, April 12. The Chief Justice, Sir Michael Myers, delivered the Court’s judgment in the case of Ilarkness v. Nutt (heard March 29). His Honor said the Court was of [the opinion that the judgment of Mr ‘justice Herdman, who had held that the appellant had failed to .satisfy him of alleged release was correct and it should not be disturbed. The appeal was accordingly dismissed with costs on the highest scale, as from a distance. The appeal wap hoard on March when Alec Leslie Harkness, of Te Kauwhata. moved against a judgment given , at. Hamilton In July, 1933, in favour lof Joseph William Nutt, of Christch u rcM.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19340412.2.114

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20278, 12 April 1934, Page 9

Word Count
368

APPEAL ALLOWED. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20278, 12 April 1934, Page 9

APPEAL ALLOWED. Star (Christchurch), Volume LXVI, Issue 20278, 12 April 1934, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert