Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SCHOOL AGE BILL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS.

•“ WILL REMOVE BARRIER KEEPING WORKERS DOWN" (United Press Assn.—By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.) (Received February 18, 12.55 p.m.) LONDON, February 17. In the House of Lords Lord Ponsonby, in moving the second reading of th£ School Age Bill, described it as a small step forward on the educational ladder and an attempt to break down the barrier which for many generations had been purposely preserved in order to keep th workrs in subjetion through ignorance. (Cries of “ No. Withdraw.”) He did not believe that the Opposition was really opposed to the principle of raising the school age. “ The expansion of education has produced the Labour Party, that is why you hesitate to carry it further,” he said. —-.--A Lord Hoilsham, in moving the tion of the Bill, said that his only motive was stated ii% Mr Snowden’s House of Commons declaration that however desirable reforms might be the country could not at present afford them.

The Archbishop of York regretted that Lord Hailsham had taken the lead “from the rising hope of the stern, unbending Tories, who was at present Chancellor of the Exchequer.”’ The main principle of the Bill was the raising of the school age. If they rejected the Bill it would be inferred that the Lords were opposed to that principle. “By the age of fourteen people have begun to read, but the cultivation of taste has not begun. It is true that the greatest social and political peril is the cheap newspaper, but the root thereof is the limited education of the people. If they had education they could not, and if they had more they would not, read them. As it is we condemn them to be the victims of such an influence.”

The Bishop of London, in supporting the Bill, claimed that the Anglican Church had been the pioneers of education in England for centuries. At present churchmen were paying £IO,OOO weekly for it. The people must be educated. The debate was adjourned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TS19310218.2.95

Bibliographic details

Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 41, 18 February 1931, Page 7

Word Count
335

SCHOOL AGE BILL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS. Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 41, 18 February 1931, Page 7

SCHOOL AGE BILL IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS. Star (Christchurch), Volume XLIV, Issue 41, 18 February 1931, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert