PARTIES TO STRIKE

Timaru Herald, Volume CLI, Issue 22183, 29 January 1942, Page 4

PARTIES TO STRIKE

Forty-Three Men Charged Sequel To Trouble At Abattoir Suspended Sentence (P.A.) AUCKLAND, Jan. 28. The sequel to the recent industrial troubles at the Auckland Municipal Abattoir was the'Appearance in the Magistrate’s Court of 43 of the employees, who were each charged before Mr J. H. Luxford, S.M., with being a party to a strike under the Strike and Lockout Regulations, 1939. The prosecutions were the first of their kind in the Auckland district. The Court presented an unusual spectacle as the defendants responded to their names and lined up in rows six deep. Mr V. H. Meredith. Crown Prosecutor, appeared for the Inspector of Factories, who instigated the proceedings, and Mr W. R. Tuck represented the defendants, who pleaded guilty. Charges against nine other employees were withdrawn 'at the request of Mr Meredith, and another man, J. Kennerley, who was represented by Mr Henry, pleaded not guilty. Mr Meredith said the Regulations defined a strike as an act of any number of workers in discontinuing their employment wholly or partially. The defendants were charged with the partial discontinuance of their work. The charges were laid in respect of Monday. January 19, when the men failed to work between 8 and 9 a.m. Their award, made in August. 1941, provided for employment for eight hours daily on five days a week. On this occasion there was ample work for the men, who were slaughtermen and labourers, to do. but they wilfully discontinued work. It was not an Isolated Instance. Object of Prosecutions “The object of these prosecutions.” said Mr Meredith, “is that there shall be vindication of the law. and that it be indicated that in these times of emergency the Regulations shall be obeyed.” Mr Tuck said he commended the impartial presentation of the case by Mr Meredith. The shortage of labour at the abattoir had caused fundamental conditions creating problems for both the management and the men themselves. It had involved considerable stress upon the men. One man had stated he had worked 70 hours in one week and had been brought out at all times to do so. Many men worked from 50 to 60 hours a week. They were paid overtime rates, but there was great strain and stress put on them. They approached the Auckland City Council and requested that the labourers’ wages be Increased so as to attract more labour. The Council replied that it was prepared to discuss any conditions except the rates of pay. Men continued to leave the works and the slaughtermen, who had nothing to gain by any dispute, acted simply to help the labourers. Tire council had achieved its purpose in obtaining the men’s assurance to continue working, said Mr Tuck, in asking the Magistrate to take that into consideration when imposing any penalty. Mr Luxford said that one of the greatest obstacles to the country changing over from a peacetime to a war footing was psychological difficulties. In a time of war certain things had to be thrown overboard when the safety and the security of the country were in danger. One of the slogans which Labour was entitled to use in peace time, that labour could be sold to the highest bidder, had to be modified in a time of war. He considered that the recent resolution adopted by the Auckland branch of the Federation of Labour in this connection was an unfortunate thing. With the labour shortage adherence to that principle became exploitation. In the present case the men, not being satisfied, had used the old system adapted for peace time. The law of to-day said those things could not be done in the old way. Court’s Proper Course "The proper course in this case is not finally to dispose of the matter,” continued the Magistrate. “If I inflict a penalty of a fine now I think that the best ends of justice would not be properly served. The defendants would be ordered to come up for sentence if called upon within the next 12 months. You will not be called if your work is carried out in the proper spirit and manner.” he added. If these were any more breaches of the regulations, there would be no question of imposing fines and the offenders would be sent to prison.